Main Article Content

Abstract

Lithology classification through well log interpretation is a fundamental task in reservoir characterization, enabling accurate delineation of subsurface formations and assessment of hydrocarbon potential. However, measurements are rarely full, and missing data intervals are prevalent due to operational difficulties or logging device failure. Thus, imputation of missing data from down-hole well logs is a prevalent issue in subsurface processes. Our work a strong emphasis on the preprocessing phase and data imputation, acknowledging that missing data in well logging is a prevalent problem that can have a major impact on classification results. Our work is part of the FORCE2020 Lithology Classification Competition. Our method underlines how important extensive data preprocessing is for improving model performance, including regression-based imputation, normalization, and class balancing by SMOTE. Traditional models like Random Forest and XGBoost were able to produce reliable results in the challenging FORCE2020 Lithology Classification. By leveraging multiple models, we aim to enhance the accuracy and robustness of our predictions, addressing the challenges posed by missing data and ensuring a more reliable classification process. We show that the Random Forest model obtains the greatest accuracy of 95% using the FORCE 2020 dataset from 118 wells in the Norwegian Sea. This study emphasizes how crucial thorough data imputation and preprocessing techniques are to raising the precision and dependability of lithology classification.

Keywords

Lithology classification FORCE 2020 dataset Machine learning

Article Details

How to Cite
[1]
Cherif Mesroua, Ibrahim Lahouel, Basma Hamrouni, Khadra Bouanane, Faiza Zidouni, and Wafa Kafi, “Enhancing Lithology Prediction through Preprocessing Techniques and Machine Learning Models”, Cybersys. J, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 65–70, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.57238/csj.2025.1007.

How to Cite

[1]
Cherif Mesroua, Ibrahim Lahouel, Basma Hamrouni, Khadra Bouanane, Faiza Zidouni, and Wafa Kafi, “Enhancing Lithology Prediction through Preprocessing Techniques and Machine Learning Models”, Cybersys. J, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 65–70, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.57238/csj.2025.1007.

References

  1. learning methods for high-quality reservoir identification: A case study of Baikouquan formation in Mahu Area of Junggar Basin, NW China,” Energies, vol. 15, no. 10, p. 3675, 2022.doi:
  2. Y. Meshalkin et al., “Well-logging-based lithology prediction using machine learning,” Data Science in Oil & Gas 2020, Eur. Assoc. Geosci. & Eng., vol. 2020, no. 1, 2020.
  3. Z. Fan et al., “Logging-data-driven lithology identification in complex reservoirs: an example from the Niuxintuo block of the Liaohe oilfield,” Front. Earth Sci., vol. 13, p. 1491334, 2025.doi: 10.3389/feart.2025.1491334 .
  4. S. R. Manda, R. Rohit et al., “Identification of lithology from well log data using machine learning,” 2024.doi: 10.4108/eetiot.5634 .
  5. T. Merembayev, R. Yunussov, and Y. Amirgaliyev, “Machine learning algorithms for classification geology data from well logging,” in Proc. 14th Int. Conf. Electron. Comput. Comput. (ICECCO), pp. 1–6, IEEE, 2018.doi: 10.1109/icecco.2018.8634775 .
  6. R. A. Mardani, M. Mardani, and D. Trad, “Rock facies imbalanced classification with over-sampling and under-sampling techniques,” arXiv preprint, arXiv:2306.06509, 2023.
  7. S. A. Garini et al., “Enhanced lithology classification in well log data using ensemble machine learning techniques,” in Proc. 2024 IEEE Int. Conf. Artif. Intell. Mechatronics Syst. (AIMS), pp. 1–5, IEEE, 2024.doi: 10.1109/aims61812.2024.10512485 .
  8. A. Hallam, D. Mukherjee, and R. Chassagne, “Multivariate imputation via chained equations for elastic well log imputation and prediction,” Appl. Comput. Geosci., vol. 14, p. 100083, 2022.doi: 10.31223/x57k6q .
  9. A. Elmgerbi, E. Chuykov, G. Thonhauser, and A. Nascimento, “Machine learning techniques application for real-time drilling hydraulic optimization,” in Proc. Int. Petroleum Technol. Conf. (IPTC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 21–23 Feb. 2022.doi: 10.2523/iptc-22662-ms
  10. T. Burak and S. Akin, “Estimation of downhole inclination in directionally drilled geothermal wells,” in Proc. World Geothermal Congr. 2020+1, Reykjavik, Iceland, pp. 1–5, 2021.doi:
  11. A. Sharma, M. Al Dushaishi, and R. Nygaard, “Evaluating PDC bit-rock interaction models to investigate torsional vibrations in geothermal drilling,” Geothermics, vol. 20, p. 103060, 2024.doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4724858
  12. A. Sharma, M. Al Dushaishi, and R. Nygaard, “Fixed bit rotary drilling failure criteria effect on drilling vibration,” in Proc. 55th U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symp., Online, pp. 1–6, 2021.
  13. T. Burak, “Application of artificial neural networks to predict the downhole inclination in directionally drilled geothermal wells,” M.S. thesis, Middle East Tech. Univ., Ankara, Türkiye, 2018.